Want to be a
Soolegal Member
About 1554 results
Kishan Dutt

PROCEDURES INVOLVED IN A FAMILY COURT CASE -Kishan Dutt Kalaskar

Kishan Dutt Kalaskar  |  22 Apr 2021
PROCEDURES INVOLVED IN A FAMILY COURT CASE -Kishan Dutt Kalaskar

PROCEDURES INVOLVED IN A FAMILY COURT CASE-Kishan Dutt Kalaskar According to Section 10 of the Family Courts Act,1984, the Family Courts are allowed to evolve their rules of procedure. The Code of Civil Procedure was amended to fulfil the reason behind…

0 Likes  |  1 Comment  |  1738 Views  |  0 Favorites
Bivas

Latest ECommerce Law in India

Bivas Chatterjee  |  22 Apr 2021
Latest ECommerce Law in India

Do you transact through different e-commerce or online platforms? In many cases we heard the complains that the item ordered to buy online or the item of desired quality was not delivered or despite ordering a valuable product for a…

0 Likes  |  2 Comments  |  1578 Views  |  0 Favorites
Advocate Sushila

SUPREME COURT REITERATES THAT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LIABILITY HAS THE EFFECT OF EXTENDING LIMITATION PERIOD

Advocate Sushila Ram  |  18 Apr 2021
SUPREME COURT REITERATES THAT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LIABILITY HAS THE EFFECT OF EXTENDING LIMITATION PERIOD

The #SupremeCourt has in a recent case of Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited vs Bishal Jaiswal and Anr. passed a Judgment dated 15-04-2021 and reiterated that #acknowledgement of #liability/#debt has the effect of commencing a fresh period of #limitation under…

0 Likes  |  3 Comments  |  1137 Views  |  0 Favorites
Advocate Sushila

SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT CLAIMS NOT FORMING PART OF APPROVED RESOLUTION PLAN ARE EXTINGUISHED

Advocate Sushila Ram  |  16 Apr 2021
SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT CLAIMS NOT FORMING PART OF APPROVED RESOLUTION PLAN ARE EXTINGUISHED

Recently, the Hon’ble #SupremeCourt of India in the case of Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, (Civil Appeal No.8129/2019), vide its Judgment dated 13.04.2021 held that any #creditor including Central/State #Government or any local…

0 Likes  |  1 Comment  |  1945 Views  |  0 Favorites
Advocate Sushila

DELHI HIGH COURT REJECTS BRITANNIA’S PLEA AGAINST ITC LTD. ON TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Advocate Sushila Ram  |  16 Apr 2021
DELHI HIGH COURT REJECTS BRITANNIA’S PLEA AGAINST ITC LTD. ON TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

The Hon’ble #DelhiHighCourt passed a Judgment dated 05.04.2021 in the case of Britannia Industries Ltd. v. ITC Ltd. & Ors. {CS (COMM) 553/2020} and held that #packaging of M/s #ITC Ltd.’s Sunfeast Farmlite 5-Seed Digestive Biscuits is not deceptively similar…

0 Likes  |  1 Comment  |  1838 Views  |  0 Favorites
Cyril

The Urgency of Creating an Awareness in Cyber Security

Cyril Jacob  |  15 Apr 2021
The Urgency of Creating an Awareness in Cyber Security

Image Courtesy - Techwisegroup.com || Article by - Cyril JacobThe alarming rise in threats across the cyber world has caused a panic like never before. With increasing platforms that facilitate transactions and conferences on a daily basis there is also…

0 Likes  |  1 Comment  |  1165 Views  |  0 Favorites
Kishan Dutt

Death Certificate of a Missing Person

Kishan Dutt Kalaskar  |  11 Apr 2021
Death Certificate of a Missing Person

Death Certificate of a Missing Person-         Kishan Dutt Kalaskar According to the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, the occurrence of death of a person has to be intimated to the Registrar of births and deaths within twenty- one days…

0 Likes  |  1 Comment  |  5054 Views  |  0 Favorites
Advocate Sushila

SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT BUSINESS RUN BY KARTA OF HINDU UNDIVIDED FAMILY CANNOT BE PRESUMED TO BE A JOINT…

Advocate Sushila Ram  |  11 Apr 2021
SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT BUSINESS RUN BY KARTA OF HINDU UNDIVIDED FAMILY CANNOT BE PRESUMED TO BE A JOINT FAMILY BUSINESS

The 3-Judges Bench of the Hon’ble #SupremeCourt of India in the case of Kiran Devi vs Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board & Ors. [CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6149/2015], vide its Judgment dated 05.04.2021 held that a business run by #Karta of…

0 Likes  |  0 Comment  |  2093 Views  |  0 Favorites
Advocate Sushila

SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT ISSUE OF NOVATION OF A CONTRACT CANNOT BE CONSIDERED IN A PETITION UNDER SECTION 11…

Advocate Sushila Ram  |  11 Apr 2021
SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT ISSUE OF NOVATION OF A CONTRACT CANNOT BE CONSIDERED IN A PETITION UNDER SECTION 11 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILAITION ACT, 1996

The Three Judge Bench of the Hon’ble #SupremeCourt of India comprising of Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman, B.R. Gavai and Hrishikesh Roy passed a Judgment dated 06.04.2021 in the case of Sanjeev Prakash v. Seema Kukreja & Ors.{Civil Appeal Nos.976 of…

0 Likes  |  0 Comment  |  1138 Views  |  0 Favorites
Advocate Sushila

SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT COMPANY COURT CAN NOT DECIDE ON DEFAULT IN A WINDING UP PROCEEDINGS

Advocate Sushila Ram  |  11 Apr 2021
SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT COMPANY COURT CAN NOT DECIDE ON DEFAULT IN A WINDING UP PROCEEDINGS

The #SupremeCourt of India in the case of Shital Fibers Ltd. v Indian Acrylics Limited (Civil Appeal No. 1105/2021), vide its Judgment dated 06.04.2021 held that the Company Court while exercising its powers under Sections 433 and 434 of the…

0 Likes  |  0 Comment  |  1202 Views  |  0 Favorites
Advanced Search
Event Type
Title
Content
Venue
Date
Author
Active Members view all

New Members view all