Want to be a
Soolegal Member
Dilpreet Singh
Resource Centre / Categories :- Judgements  » Civil Litigation
‘Common Parlance’, ‘Popular Meaning’, Marketability Measures Appropriate only when tariffs entry can be categorized in more than one head
Dilpreet Singh | 01/01/1970

On Friday i.e. 1st May 2020, the Supreme Court rejected the appeals of the Delhi Central Excise Commissioner against the CESTAT's 2008 decision that 'car matting' should be paid at 8% within the heading ‘Carpets and Other Cloth Floor Coverings' and not at 16% within 'Vehicles other than Railway or Tram Rolling-Stock and Parts and Accessories’.

View (0) Share (0) Download (0)

More Documents By Dilpreet Singh

Author Image
Resource Centre / Categories :- Legal Formats
SC relief: Voda-Idea to get Rs 733 crore out of Rs 4750 crore tax refund claim
Unknown Author | N/A

No description available.

Read more ..
Download
Author Image
Resource Centre / Categories :- Legal Formats
Any decision of Arbitral Tribunal can't be questioned by Way to Writ Petition
Unknown Author | N/A

No description available.

Read more ..
Download
Author Image
Resource Centre / Categories :- Legal Formats
Accused can challenge conviction in Appeal filed by State even if never preferred a Formal Appeal
Unknown Author | N/A

No description available.

Read more ..
Download
Author Image
Resource Centre / Categories :- Legal Formats
Right to raise Objection wave of on Non-Participation in Arbitral proceedings
Unknown Author | N/A

No description available.

Read more ..
Download

Related Documents