Want to be a
Soolegal Member
Team SoOLEGAL
27 Jun 2017 1:46pm

Delhi HC: Litigant owes a duty to be vigilant of his rights, Can’t Put Entire Blame On Advocate To Get Delay Condoned

0
0
3
0

The High Court of Delhi earlier rapped an Appellant-company for their lack of vigilance in conducting a suit for recovery of money, and their subsequent conduct in blaming the Counsel for the delay in filing an Appeal.

The High Court was hearing an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking condonation of delay of 400 days in filing an appeal against an August, 2015 judgment passed by the Additional District Judge. 

“The litigant owes a duty to be vigilant of his rights and is also expected to be equally vigilant about the judicial proceedings p


Tagged: High Court of Delhi Litigant owes a duty to be vigilant
Did you find this write-up useful? YES 0 NO 1
Active Members view all

New Members view all